Press Release
Couple Who Lost Home In Witch-Creek Fire Indicted For Fraud
For Immediate Release
U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of California
San Diego, CA - United States Attorney Laura E. Duffy announced that Deborah and Douglas Tumlinson of Valley Center were arraigned today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on a ten-count indictment for various fraud charges they allegedly orchestrated after losing their home in the 2007 Witch Creek fire.
In October 2007, the Tumlinsons’ home in Ramona was destroyed by wildfire. The Tumlinsons originally joined a class-action lawsuit against San Diego Gas & Electric (“SDG&E”) to recoup losses from the fire. The indictment alleges that although the Tumlinsons did not enter a settlement with SDG&E, they obtained a loan from U.S. Claims, a funding company, by falsely claiming they had reached a settlement and promising to use the settlement funds as collateral. They were later sued by U.S. Claims for not making any payments on the loan.
The indictment also charges that the Tumlinsons took the proceeds from the U.S. Claims loan and laundered over $500,000 to purchase a new house in Valley Center. Next, the Tumlinsons allegedly made material misrepresentations on a loan application to Seaside Funding, Inc., a Carlsbad mortgage broker company, to obtain a $250,000 home equity loan on their new Valley Center home. They also failed to repay the Seaside Funding loan.
Finally, the Tumlinsons filed for bankruptcy three times, but are accused of intentionally failing to list the outstanding loan debt to U.S. Claims on their bankruptcy petitions.
The Tumlinsons are scheduled to appear before U.S. District Court Judge Janis L. Sammartino for a motion hearing on November 14, 2014.
DEFENDANT | Case Number: 14CR2978-JLS | |
Deborah Tumlinson | Age: 43 | (Counts 1-9) |
Douglas Tumlinson | Age: 40 | (Counts 1, 3-8, 10) |
CHARGES | ||
Count 1: Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 (Conspiracy) | ||
INVESTIGATING AGENCY | ||
Federal Bureau of Investigation | ||
*Indictments and complaints are not evidence that the defendant committed the crime charged. |
Updated July 23, 2015
Component