Home New Haven Press Releases 2009 Paralegal Indicted for Alleged Role in Fairfield County Mortgage Fraud Scheme
Info
This is archived material from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) website. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function.

Paralegal Indicted for Alleged Role in Fairfield County Mortgage Fraud Scheme

U.S. Attorney’s Office October 09, 2009
  • District of Connecticut (203) 821-3700

Nora R. Dannehy, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, today announced that a federal grand jury sitting in Bridgeport has returned an indictment charging HEATHER BLISS, 34, of Norwalk, with one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and three counts of bank fraud. The charges stem from an alleged mortgage fraud scheme.

The indictment alleges that BLISS was employed as a paralegal for a real estate lawyer in Wilton and, in that capacity, had responsibility for preparing and maintaining all legal and bank documents related to real estate transactions handled by her employer. The indictment further alleges that, from approximately April 2006 to April 2007, BLISS, the lawyer for whom she was employed, a property developer and others conspired to defraud JP Morgan Chase Bank, IndyMac Bank, and Washington Mutual Bank, in a mortgage fraud scheme.

The Indictment alleges that BLISS and her co-conspirators submitted false mortgage loan applications to financial institutions to obtain mortgages on various properties in Fairfield County in order to develop and sell the properties for profit, and to pay off debts owed to “hard money” lenders from whom they had previously obtained high interest loans. The mortgage applications, which included false income information and omitted the mortgage applicants’ true indebtedness, caused the financial institutions to issue mortgage loans on properties that BLISS and her co-conspirators would not have otherwise been qualified to purchase, allowing the applicants to qualify for mortgages that far exceeded their ability to repay the loans.

The indictment alleges that BLISS overstated her income on the mortgages for which she had personally applied, and that she applied for new mortgages within 60 days of receiving prior mortgages knowing that the earlier mortgage would not be revealed when BLISS’ credit report was run by the financial institution to which she applied.

Through this scheme, it is alleged that BLISS and her co-conspirators defrauded the three financial institutions of a total of more than $3.5 million.

If convicted, BLISS faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 30 years on each count, and a fine of up to approximately $7 million.

The indictment was returned on October 7. Yesterday, BLISS appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Holly B. Fitzsimmons and entered a plea of not guilty to each of the charges. Following her arraignment, BLISS was released on a bond in the amount of $250,000.

U.S. Attorney Dannehy stressed that an indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is entitled to a fair trial at which it is the Government’s burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

This matter is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Rahul Kale.

In July 2009, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation announced the formation of the Connecticut Mortgage Fraud Task Force to investigate and prosecute mortgage fraud cases and related financial crimes occurring in Connecticut. In addition to investigating past mortgage fraud schemes, the Task Force will focus on emerging crime trends that are associated with the growing tide of foreclosures, including “foreclosure rescue” schemes, and “short sale” schemes. Citizens are encouraged to report any suspected mortgage fraud activity by calling 203-333-3512 and requesting the Connecticut Mortgage Fraud Task Force, or by sending an e-mail to ctmortgagefraud@ic.fbi.gov.

The Connecticut Mortgage Fraud Task Force includes representatives from the U.S. Attorney’s Office; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division; U.S. Postal Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Inspector General, and State of Connecticut Department of Banking.

This content has been reproduced from its original source.