|
January 2000 - Volume 2 - Number 1
|
Survey of Forensic Science Laboratories by the Technical Working Group for Fire and Explosions (TWGFEX)
Tables
Table 1 Education of the Survey Respondents
Educational Discipline
|
Number |
Percent |
None listed |
72 |
33.3 |
Chemistry or subset of chemistry |
94 |
43.5 |
Biology or subset of biology |
13 |
6.0 |
Biology/chemistry combination |
6 |
2.8 |
Forensic science and related |
22 |
10.2 |
Engineering or physics |
3 |
1.4 |
Other categories |
6 |
2.8 |
|
Back to the article
Table 2 Percentages of Analysts Performing Specific Investigative Activities
Investigative Activities Performed |
Percentages of Analysts
|
Fire Debris Analysts | Explosion Debris Analysts | Fire and Explosion Debris Analysts |
Crime scene investigation |
18.0 |
29.4 |
47.2 |
Rendering safe |
NA |
5.5 |
1.6 |
Incendiary device analysis |
23.0 |
43.1 |
54.3 |
Intact explosives analysis |
NA |
46.8 |
47.6 |
Residue analysis |
62.0 |
74.3 |
79.5 |
Component evaluation |
38.0 |
51.4 |
54.3 |
Ignitable residue analysis |
95.0 |
NA |
93.8 |
Crime scene reconstruction |
2.0 |
11.0 |
12.6 |
Fire modeling |
0.0 |
NA |
1.6 |
Executing search warrants |
0.0 |
10.1 |
6.3 |
|
Back to the article
Table 3 Percentages of Analysts Performing Specific Laboratory Procedures
Laboratory Procedures Performed |
Percentage of Fire Debris Analysts |
Percentage of Explosion Debris Analysts |
Analysis of intact low explosives |
NA |
37.5 |
Analysis of intact high explosives |
NA |
25.5 |
Analysis of intact improvised explosives |
NA |
27.5 |
Analysis of post-blast low explosives |
NA |
43.0 |
Analysis of post-blast high-explosives |
NA |
23.0 |
Analysis of post-blast improvised explosives |
NA |
35.0 |
Analysis of post-blast device components |
NA |
28.0 |
Ignitable liquid analysis |
85.0 |
NA |
Ignitable liquid residue analysis |
85.5 |
NA |
Intact incendiary device analysis |
34.2 |
NA |
Analysis ofpost-ignition incendiary devices |
40.2 |
NA |
|
Back to the article
Table 4 Minimum On-the-Job Training for Fire Debris Analysts
Minimum Length of Training |
Number of Analysts in Favor |
Percent of Analysts in Favor |
New Fire Debris Analysts |
Two to six months |
13 |
11.8 |
Six months to one year |
61 |
55.5 |
One to two years |
30 |
27.3 |
More than two years |
6 |
5.5 |
Experienced Fire Debris Analysts |
One to six months |
52 |
47.3 |
Six months to one year |
47 |
42.7 |
One to two years |
10 |
9.1 |
More than two years |
1 |
0.9 |
|
Back to the article
Table 5 Courses of Greatest Interest to Fire Debris Analysts
Courses |
Rating (1 - 7 scale) |
General Training |
Crime scene search |
4.24 |
Instrumental analysis |
6.35 |
Chemical analysis |
6.20 |
Sample clean-up processes |
5.51 |
Continuing Education |
Training in electrical circuitry |
3.87 |
Analytical methodology |
4.48 |
Funded federal training |
5.26 |
Training with NCFS |
5.59 |
Collection and preservation of evidence |
4.40 |
Course in fire dynamics and behavior |
5.09 |
Course in petroleum refining |
5.09 |
Computer fire modeling |
4.23 |
Mass spectral interpretation |
5.85 |
Fire scene search |
4.82 |
Internet resources for fire debris analysis |
5.20 |
Regional training by professional associations |
5.67 |
|
Back to the article
Table 6 Courses Rated by Explosion Debris Analysts
Courses |
Rating (1 - 7 scale) |
General Training |
|
Laboratory safety procedures |
6.74 |
Rules of evidence |
6.26 |
Understanding the judicial system |
4.78 |
Legal terminology and definitions |
5.04 |
Courtroom procedures |
5.52 |
General crime scene investigation |
5.59 |
Recognition of physical evidence |
6.70 |
Preservation of physical evidence |
6.85 |
Explosives Analysis
|
|
History of explosives |
4.90 |
Different types of explosives |
6.49 |
Terminology and vocabulary of explosives |
6.27 |
Manufacturing of explosives |
5.50 |
Composition of low explosive materials |
6.64 |
Composition of high explosive materials |
6.51 |
Construction of commercial pyrotechnic devices |
5.88 |
Construction of improvised devices |
6.05 |
Construction of military devices |
5.56 |
Analytical examination of explosion debris residues |
6.69 |
Range procedures |
4.42 |
Recovery of improvised explosive device components |
6.16 |
|
Back to the article
Table 7 Minimum On-the-Job Training for Explosion Debris Analysts
Minimum Length of Training |
Percentage of Analysts in Favor |
New Explosion Debris Analysts |
Two to six months |
7.4 |
Six months to one year |
37.0 |
One to two years |
40.7 |
More than two years |
14.8 |
Experienced Explosion Debris Analysts |
|
One to six months |
37.0 |
Six months to one year |
37.0 |
One to two years |
18.5 |
More than two years |
7.4 |
|
Back to the article
Table 8 Training Courses and Continuing Education Courses Rated by Explosion Debris Analysts
Courses |
Rating (1 - 7 scale) |
Explosion Debris Analysis Training |
Crime scene search |
5.37 |
Instrumental analysis |
6.07 |
Chemical analysis |
5.96 |
Sample cleanup processes |
5.37 |
Explosives workshops |
6.04 |
Pyrotechnic devices |
5.63 |
Explosives microscopy |
6.15 |
Regional workshops on explosives analysis |
6.07 |
Explosives Analysis Continuing Education |
EOD range time |
5.23 |
Training in electrical circuitry |
4.92 |
Seminars by explosives manufacturers |
5.73 |
Analytical methodology |
5.65 |
Refresher courses in IED recognition |
5.12 |
Funded federal training |
5.81 |
Training with NCFS |
5.73 |
Collection and preservation of evidence |
5.04 |
Course in fire dynamics and behavior |
4.25 |
Mass spectral interpretation |
5.04 |
Internet resources for explosion debris analysis |
4.92 |
Regional training by professional associations |
5.62 |
|
Back to the article
Table 9 Tests and Analyses Rated by Frequency of Use
Procedures |
Rating (1 - 7 scale) |
Chemical Tests
|
Microchemical analysis |
5.70 |
PLM |
4.51 |
Stereomicroscopy |
6.18 |
Spot tests |
5.80 |
TLC |
3.48 |
Ignition analysis |
4.83 |
Field explosives screening |
1.36 |
Instrumental Analyses
|
IR |
3.77 |
SEM-EDX |
4.38 |
SEM-WDX |
0.43 |
ICP |
0.49 |
XRF |
1.95 |
GC/MS |
3.56 |
HPLC |
1.35 |
CE |
0.58 |
IC |
1.23 |
GC/TEA |
0.62 |
HPLC/TEA |
0.38 |
GC/FID |
1.07 |
GC/ECD |
0.33 |
IMS |
0.19 |
NMR |
0.04 |
HPLC/MS |
0.42 |
Raman spectrometry |
0.18 |
ICP |
0.30 |
FTIR |
5.10 |
Other |
0.92 |
|
Back to the article
Table 10 Interest in and Importance of Activities and Projects as Rated by Survey Respondents
Activity or Project |
Rating (1 - 7 scale) |
Extent to which laboratory encourages continuing education |
3.50 |
Examiner interest in continuing education via distance learning |
5.17 |
TWG promotion of continuing education |
6.10 |
TWG maintenance of an Internet library |
6.13 |
Importance of national reporting of standards |
4.11 |
Interest in a pyrolysis library |
6.18 |
Importance of a national database of chromatography data |
5.70 |
Importance of a national source of ignitable standards |
6.10 |
|
Back to the article