Home About Us Laboratory Services Forensic Science Communications Back Issues April 1999 Fiber Guidelines, Chapter 2 (FSC, April 1999)

Fiber Guidelines, Chapter 2 (FSC, April 1999)


April 1999 - Volume 1 - Number 1

Chapter 2 of Forensic Fiber Examination Guidelines

Microscopy of Textile Fibers

Read about …

1.0. Scope
2.0. Reference Documents
3.0. Terminology
4.0. Summary of Guidelines
5.0. Significance and Use
6.0. Sample Handling
7.0. Analysis
8.0. Report Documentation
9.0. References
1.0. Scope

This section describes guidelines for microscopical examinations employed in forensic fiber characterization, identification, and comparison. Several types of light microscopes are used including stereobinocular, polarized light, comparison, fluorescence, and interference. In certain instances, the scanning electron microscope yields additional information. The nature and extent of the fiber evidence will dictate which tests or techniques are selected and performed.

2.0. Reference Documents

SWGMAT Quality Assurance Guidelines
SWGMAT Trace Evidence Handling Guidelines

3.0. Terminology

Anisotropic: An object that has properties that differ according to the direction of measurement when viewed in polarized light.

Barrier Filter: A filter used in fluorescence microscopy that suppresses unnecessary excitation light that has not been absorbed by the fiber and selectively transmits only the fluorescence.

Becke Line: The bright halo near the boundary of a fiber that moves with respect to that boundary as the microscope is focused through best focus.

Becke Line Method: A method for determining the refractive index of a fiber relative to its mountant by noting the direction in which the Becke line moves when the focus is changed. The Becke line will always move toward the higher refractive index medium (fiber or mountant) when focus is raised and will move toward the lower refractive index medium when focus is lowered.

Birefringence: The numerical difference in refractive indices for a fiber, given by the formula: n
ll - n^. Birefringence can be calculated by determining the retardation (r) and thickness (T) at a particular point in a fiber and by using the formula: B = r (nm)/1,000 T (mm).

Comparison Microscope: A system of two microscopes positioned side by side and connected via an optical bridge in which specimens are examined simultaneously in either transmitted or reflected light.

Compensator: Any variety of optical devices that can be placed in the light path of a polarizing microscope to introduce fixed or variable retardation comparable with that exhibited by the fiber. The retardation and sign of elongation of the fiber is then determined. Compensators can employ a fixed mineral plate of constant or varying thickness or a mineral plate that is rotated to alter the thickness presented to the optical path (and retardation introduced) by a set amount.

Compensator, Full Wave (Red Plate): A compensator using a plate of gypsum, selenite, or quartz, which introduces a fixed retardation between 530-550 nm (approximately the retardation of the first order red color on the Michel-Lévy chart).

Compensator, Quarter Wave: A compensator, usually with a mica plate, which introduces a fixed retardation between 125-150 nm.

Compensator, Quartz Wedge: A wedge, cut from quartz, having continuously variable retardation extending over several orders of interference colors (usually 3-7).

Compensator, Sénarmont: A quarter-wave plate inserted above the specimen in the parallel 0” position with a rotating calibrated analyzer. Measures low retardation and requires the use of monochromatic light.

Compensator, Tilting (Berek): A compensator typically containing a plate of calcite or quartz, which can be rotated by means of a calibrated drum to introduce variable retardation up to about ten orders.

Cortex: The main structural component of hair consisting of elongated and fusiform (spindle-shaped) cells. The cortex contains pigment grains, air spaces called cortical fusi, and structures called ovoid bodies.

Crimp: The waviness of a fiber.

Cross-Over Marks: Oblique flattened areas along silk fibers caused by the overlapping of extruded silk fibers before they have dried completely.

Cuticle: The layer of scales composing the outer surface of a hair shaft. Cuticular scales are normally classified into three basic types: coronal (crown-like), spinous (petal-like), and imbricate (flattened).

Delustrant: A pigment, usually titanium dioxide, used to dull the luster of a manufactured fiber.

Dichroism: The property of exhibiting different colors, especially two different colors, when viewed in polarized light along different axes.

Dislocations: Concerning natural fibers (e.g., flax, ramie, jute, and hemp) where distinct features in the shape of X’s, I’s, and V’s are present along the fiber cell wall. These features are often useful for identification.

Dispersion of Birefringence: The variation of birefringence with wavelength of light. When dispersion of birefringence is significant in a particular fiber, anomalous interference colors not appearing in the regular color sequence of the Michel-Lévy chart may result. Strong dispersion of birefringence also interferes with the accurate determination of retardation in highly birefringent fibers.

Dispersion Staining: A technique for refractive index determination that employs central or annular stops placed in the objective back focal plane of a microscope. Using an annular stop with the substage iris closed, a fiber mounted in a high-dispersion medium will show a colored boundary of a wavelength where the fiber and the medium match in refractive index. Using a central stop, the fiber will show colors complimentary to those seen with an annular stop.

Dyes: Soluble substances that add color to textiles. Dyes are classified into groups that have similar chemical characteristics (e.g., aniline, acid, and azo). They are incorporated into the fiber by chemical reaction, absorption, or dispersion.

Excitation Filter: A filter used in fluorescence microscopy that transmits specific bands or wavelengths of energy capable of inducing visible fluorescence in various substrates.

Inorganic Fibers: A class of fibers of natural mineral origin (e.g., chrysotile asbestos) and manmade mineral origin (e.g., fiberglass).

Interference Colors: Colors produced by the interference of two out-of-phase rays of white light when a birefringent material is observed at a nonextinction position between crossed polars. The retardation at a particular point in a birefringent fiber is determined by comparing the observed interference color to the Michel-Lévy chart.

Isotropic: An object that is identical in all directions and invariant with respect to direction.

Light Microscope: A microscope that employs light in the visible or near-visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Lignin: The majority noncarbohydrate portion of wood. It is an amorphous polymeric substance that cements cellulosic fibers together. The principal constituent of woody cell walls.

Lumen: The cavity or central canal present in many natural fibers (e.g., cotton, flax, ramie, jute, and hemp). Its presence and structure are often a useful aid in identification.

Luster: The gloss or shine possessed by a fiber, resulting from its reflection of light. The luster of manufactured fibers is often modified by use of a delustering pigment.

Manufactured Fiber: A class name for various families of fibers produced from fiber-forming substances, which are synthesized polymers, modified or transformed natural polymers, and glass.

Medulla: The central portion of a hair composed of a series of discrete cells or an amorphous spongy mass. It may be air-filled and, if so, will appear opaque or black using transmitted light or white using reflected light. In animal hair, several types have been defined: uniserial or multiserial ladder, cellular or vacuolated, and lattice.

Michel-Lévy Chart: A chart relating thickness, birefringence, and retardation so that any one of these variables can be determined for an anisotropic fiber when the other two are known.

Microscopical: Concerning a microscope or the use of a microscope.

Modification Ratio: A geometrical parameter used in the characterization of noncircular fiber cross sections. The modification ratio is the ratio in size between the outside diameter of the fiber and the diameter of the core. It is also called aspect ratio.

Natural Fibers: A class name of fibers of vegetable origin (e.g., cotton, flax, and ramie), animal origin (e.g., silk, wool, and specialty furs), or of mineral origin (e.g., asbestos).

Pigment: A finely divided insoluble material used to deluster or color fibers (e.g., titanium dioxide and iron oxide).

Plane Polarized Light: Light that is vibrating in one plane.

Pleochroism: The property of exhibiting different colors, especially three different colors, when viewed in polarized light along different axes.

Polarized Light: A bundle of light rays with a single propagation direction and a single vibration direction. The vibration direction is always perpendicular to the propagation direction. It is produced by use of a polarizing filter, from ordinary light by reflection, or double refraction in a suitable pleochroic substance.

Polarized Light Microscope: A microscope equipped with two polarizing filters, one below the stage (the polarizer) and one above the stage (the analyzer).

Privileged Direction (of a Polarizer): The direction of vibration to which light emerging from a polarizer has been restricted.

Refractive Index: For a particular transparent medium, the ratio of the speed of light in a vacuum to the speed of light in that medium.

Relative Refractive Index: The estimate of the refractive index of a fiber in relation to the index of its surrounding medium.

Retardation (r): The actual distance of one of the doubly refracted rays behind the other as they emerge from an anisotropic fiber. Dependent upon the difference in the two refractive indices, n2 – n1, and the thickness of the fiber.

Sign of Elongation: Referring to the elongation of a fiber in relation to refractive indices. If elongated in the direction of the high refractive index, the fiber is said to be positive, and if elongated in the direction of the low refractive index, it is said to be negative.

Spherulites: Spheres composed of needles or rods all oriented perpendicular to the outer surface or a plane section through such a sphere. A common form of polymer crystallization from melts or concentrated solutions.

Stereomicroscope: A microscope containing two separate optical systems, one for each eye, giving a stereoscopic view of a specimen.

Surface Dye: A colorant bound to the surface of a fiber.

Synthetic Fibers: A class of manufactured polymeric fibers that are synthesized from chemical compounds (e.g., nylon and polyester).

Technical Fiber: A bundle of natural fibers composed of individual elongated cells that can be physically or chemically separated and examined microscopically for identifying characteristics (e.g., hemp, jute, and sisal).

Thermoplastic Fiber: A synthetic fiber that will soften or melt at high temperatures and harden again when cooled.

Thickness (T): The optical path through the fiber used for the calculation of birefringence, typically measured in micrometers.

4.0. Summary of Microscopy Guidelines

Textile fibers are examined microscopically. They are mounted on glass microscope slides in a mounting medium under a cover slip. The fibers are then examined microscopically with a combination of various illumination sources, filters, and instrumentation attached to a microscope to determine their polymer type and record any microscopic characteristics. Known and questioned fibers are then compared to determine if they exhibit the same microscopic characteristics and optical properties.

5.0. Significance and Use

Microscopic examination provides the quickest, most accurate, and least destructive means of determining the microscopic characteristics and polymer type of textile fibers. Additionally, a point-by-point and side-by-side microscopic comparison provides the most discriminating method of determining if two or more fibers are consistent with originating from the same source. These guidelines require specific pieces of instrumentation outlined herein.

6.0. Sample Handling

6.1. Preparing Samples
Items of evidence are visually inspected, and tweezers are used to remove fibers of interest. Simple magnifiers and stereomicroscopes, with a variety of illumination techniques, may also be employed. Other methods such as tape lifting or gentle scraping are usually conducted after a visual examination. Tape lifts should be placed on clear plastic sheets, glass microscope slides, or another uncontaminated substrate that eases the search and removal of selected fibers. Do not overload the tapes. The tape lifts or any material recovered from scraping should be examined with a stereomicroscope, and fibers of interest should be isolated for further analysis. Fibers on tape lifts are removed using tweezers, other microscopic tools, and solvents (1-6). Tape should not be attached to paper or cardboard.

6.2. Avoiding Contamination
Take care to ensure contamination does not occur. This must be accomplished by examining questioned and known items in separate areas, at different times, or both. The work area and tools must be thoroughly cleaned and inspected before examining items that are to be compared.

7.0. Analysis

7.1. Microscopy
Fibers should be first examined with a stereomicroscope. Physical features such as crimp, length, color, relative diameter, luster, apparent cross section, damage, and adhering debris should be noted. Fibers are then tentatively classified into broad groups such as synthetic, natural, or inorganic. If the sample contains yarns, threads, or sections of fabric, construction should be recorded (7-9).

7.1.1. Side-by-Side Comparisons. If all of the characteristics are the same under the stereoscope, the next step is to examine the fibers with a comparison microscope. This side-by-side and point-by-point examination is the best technique to discriminate between fibers, especially those that appear to be similar. The physical characteristics of the fibers (see subsection 7.3) must be compared visually with the comparison microscope to determine if they are the same in the known and questioned samples. Photography is recommended to capture the salient features for later demonstration.

7.1.2. Illumination and Magnification. Comparisons should be made under the same illumination conditions at the same magnifications. For comparison microscopes, this requires color balancing the light sources. This is best achieved with two fibers or fiber samples from the same source mounted on two microscope slides, which are then compared. The visual responses from the two samples must be approximately the same color, brightness, and clarity. A balanced neutral background color is optimal.

7.2. Fiber Mounts
Many suitable media are available as temporary and permanent fiber mounts. The choice of mountant depends on availability, the particular application, and examiner preference. However, the following certain criteria (5, 10-15) must be met:

7.2.1. Mounting Media. An examiner should be aware of the possible deleterious effects that a mounting medium (especially solvent-based media) has on textile fibers, particularly when mounted for a long time. It is preferable that the mounted fibers that were previously examined microscopically be used for chemical analysis. If fibers must be removed for further testing, the mounting medium should be removed with a solvent that will not affect the structure or composition of the fiber.

7.2.2. Consistency of Mountants. Fibers that are to be compared microscopically must be mounted in a mounting medium. The same mountant should be used for both questioned and known fibers.

7.2.3. Indexing Mountants. If a solvent-based mounting medium is used for refractive index (q.v.) determination, the index of the mountant should be checked periodically against solid refractive index standards and, if necessary, readjusted to its proper value by the addition of solvent (16). Additionally, the refractive index of the medium can be measured directly, and the value can be recorded by the examiner. If such a medium is used for permanent mounts, the examiner should be aware of the different refractive indices for the fluid medium and the resin after solvent evaporation.

7.2.4. Using Liquids. Liquids used for exact refractive index determinations should be known to within +0.0005 refractive index units at nD. To make appropriate temperature corrections, values for the temperature coefficient (dn/dt) for each liquid and a thermometer covering the range 20-30°C, calibrated in tenths of a degree, should be available. High dispersion liquids (V < 30) are desirable for dispersion staining and the Becke line method (17). Cargille refractive index liquids are suitable for this purpose and are recommended for refractive index measurements of fibers.

7.3. Physical Characteristics of Manufactured Fibers

7.3.1. Fiber Diameter. The diameter of circular fibers can be measured using a calibrated eyepiece graticule. Noncircular fibers require special considerations (18). If fiber diameters are not uniform within a sample, a determination of the range of diameters exhibited by the sample is recommended.

7.3.2. Fiber Color. Color can be uniform along the length of a fiber, or it can vary. Variation in color between fibers in a sample should be recorded. The examiner should be able to distinguish between dyed, surface-dyed, and pigmented fibers.

7.3.3. Delustrant Particles. The presence or absence of delustrant particles is a useful comparative feature. If present, the size, shape, distribution, relative abundance, and general appearance should be noted. Delustrant particles, although not indicative of any particular generic fiber type, can be characteristic of end-use properties needed by a manufacturer. Also, delustrants serve to eliminate all but manufactured fibers.

7.3.4. Cross-Sectional Shape. When viewed longitudinally on glass slides in a suitable mountant, the apparent cross-sectional shape of fibers can often be determined by slowly focusing through the fiber (optical sectioning). Actual fiber cross sections provide the best information on cross-sectional shape. (See section 8.1)

7.3.5. Fiber Surface Characteristics. Record fiber surface characteristics such as manufacturing striations, damage, and surface debris (e.g., droplets, blood, or other foreign material). Surface striations are more apparent in a mounting medium of refractive index significantly different from those of the fiber (7).

7.4. Physical Characteristics of Natural Fibers

7.4.1. Physical Features. Color, diameter, and miscellaneous physical features described previously should be noted for natural fibers. The following characteristics should also be noted.

7.4.2. Morphological Features of Animal Hairs. The principal morphological features of animal hairs are the root, medulla, cortex, and cuticle. Shield size and subshield strictures are also useful traits for species identification. Medullary and cortical structures are best observed on hairs mounted on a slide with a suitable mounting medium. Cuticular scales are best observed on replicas cast in a transparent polymer (scale casts). Scale counts (scales per 100 micrometers) can help distinguish specialty fur fibers (19-22). Silk, a protein fiber produced by caterpillars, has morphological features that differ from animal hairs. Some features of silk include crossover marks and a wedge to triangular cross section with rounded corners. In textiles, silk is occasionally seen as paired fibers cemented together, but it is most often found as single fibers (23).

7.4.3. Plant Fibers. Plant fibers can be encountered as the technical fiber (cordage, sacks, and mats) or as individual cells (fabrics and paper). The examination of technical fibers should include a search for epidermal tissue and crystals and the preparation of a cross section. Additionally, a chemical test for lignin may be performed. Technical fibers should be macerated, fabrics teased apart, and paper repulped for the examination of individual cells. Relative thickness of cell walls and lumen, cell length, and the presence, type, and distribution of dislocations should be noted. The direction of twist of the cellulose in the cell wall can also be determined (24). Other characteristic cells should be noted and compared to authentic specimens (25-27).

7.5. Physical Characteristics of Inorganic Fibers

7.5.1 Asbestos Minerals. Mineral fibers are commonly called asbestos, which is a general term for many naturally occurring fibrous hydrated silicate minerals. The asbestos minerals include chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, fibrous tremolite/actinolite, and fibrous anthophyllite. Chrysotile belongs to the serpentine group of minerals that are layer silicates. The other asbestos minerals are amphiboles and are classified as chain silicates. Asbestos fibers alone or mixed with other components occur in building materials and insulation products. Chrysotile is the only asbestos mineral that would be encountered as a woven fabric, but any of the asbestos minerals are found in pressed sheets such as gaskets. Take care when analyzing asbestos fibers because they are considered a potential health hazard.

All asbestos minerals can be easily identified by their optical properties using polarized light microscopy. Although not considered essential, the dispersion staining technique is extremely helpful (28-29). Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry can also be used to characterize the asbestos minerals. Nonmicroscopical techniques for asbestos identification include X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy.

Glass fibers are often encountered in building materials and insulation products. Glass fibers are also called manmade vitreous fibers (30). On the basis of the starting materials used to produce glass fibers, they can be placed into three categories: fiberglass (continuous and noncontinuous), mineral wool (rock wool and slag wool), and refractory ceramic fibers (glass ceramic fibers). Single crystal and polycrystalline refractory fibers such as aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, zirconium oxide, and carbon are not included because they are not considered glass fibers.

Light microscopy is used, together with classical immersion methods, to determine the refractive index for the classification and comparison of glass fibers. The dispersion staining technique is used when determining the refractive index and variation of the refractive index within a sample. Determination and comparison of the refractive index of noncontinuous (fiberglass) wool, rock wool, and slag wool can also be accomplished by annealing the fibers and using the double variation method (31-33). Solubility tests using 10 percent HCl should be conducted and the results noted. A binder resin that fluoresces under UV light may also be present on some glass wool products.

Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry is used to provide elemental composition. Elemental ratios are used for comparison purposes. It is necessary to eliminate any absorption effects when acquiring the energy dispersive spectrum. Otherwise, artificial variation in the elemental composition is introduced (34).

7.6. Optical Characteristics

Detailed discussions of optical characteristics are provided by McCrone (35-38), McCrone, McCrone, and Delly (18), Bloss (39), Chamot and Mason (40), Hartshorne and Stuart (41), and Stoiber and Morse (42).

7.6.1. Refractive Index. The refractive index, n, of a transparent material is n = (speed of light in a vacuum)/(speed of light in the material). All transparent fibers other than glass display two principle refractive indices, one for light polarized parallel to the long axis of the fiber (nll) and one for light polarized perpendicular to the long axis of the fiber (n^). For fibers examined in unpolarized light, a third quantity, niso (defined as 1/3[2 n^ + nll]), may also be estimated. Because refractive index varies with wavelength and temperature, a standard refractive index (n), is defined for all transparent materials as the refractive index at a wavelength of 589 nm (the D line of sodium) at 25°C.

The refractive indices of a fiber are determined by several methods. Whatever the method used, determination of nll and n^ should be made using plane polarized light with the fiber aligned parallel and perpendicular to the privileged direction of the polarizer, respectively. The vibration direction of the polarizer should coincide with the horizontal line of the eyepiece graticule.

Refractive index measurements are either relative or exact. A relative refractive index measurement involves (a) determining whether an immersed object is higher or lower in refractive index than the immersion medium and (b) estimating the approximate refractive index on the basis of amount of contrast between the fiber and the medium. The contrast shows the amount of difference between the fiber and the medium. Exact numerical values for nll and n^ of a fiber (at 589 nm at 25°C) can be determined by the Becke line method or by dispersion staining. Measurements using these methods have a precision of ±0.001 (18).

For a fiber displaying two refractive indices, birefringence is defined as |nll - n^|. Birefringence is determined measuring nll and n^ and using the previous formula or by determining the retardation with the corresponding thickness of the fiber and calculated with the following formula:
Retardation (nm)/Birefringence = 1,000 × Thickness (

The retardation can be estimated by observing the interference color displayed at the point where the thickness of the fiber is measured and by comparing it to the Michel-Lévy chart. Take care when interpreting results from deeply dyed fibers, as the dye can obscure the interference colors. A wedge slice through the fiber; the use of various compensators such as the Sénarmont, quartz wedge, and tilting (Berek); or both can be used to make a more accurate determination of retardation (43). When measuring retardation of a fiber using a tilting compensator or quartz wedge, one must assure no error has been introduced because of differences in dispersion of birefringence between the compensator and the fiber (44). This is of special concern with the examination of fibers with high birefringence. The birefringence of noncircular fibers is estimated by measuring both retardation and thickness at two points along the fiber that represent their highest and lowest values (45).

7.6.2. Birefringence. For a birefringent fiber, the sign of elongation is positive (+) if nll > n^ and negative (-) if nll < n^. It should be noted that all common manufactured fibers with a birefringence higher than 0.010 have a positive sign of elongation. Full- or quarter-wave compensators are commonly used to make this determination for fibers with low birefringence (5, 39).

7.6.3. Pleochroism. Pleochroism (or dichroism) is the differential absorption of light by an object when viewed at different orientations relative to the vibration direction of plane polarized light. Certain dyed fibers and some mineral fibers may exhibit pleochroism.

7.6.4. Fluorescence. Fluorescence is the emission of light of a certain wavelength by an object when excited by light of a shorter wavelength (higher energy). Fluorescence may arise from fibers themselves or from dyes and other additives. Fibers should be mounted in a low- to-nonfluorescent medium to observe fluorescence. Examination using various combinations of excitation and barrier filters is desirable. At each excitation wavelength, the color and intensity or absence of fluorescence emission should be noted (5, 7, 46-50).

7.7. Miscellaneous Techniques

7.7.1. Preparing Cross Sections. Physical cross sections from fibers as short as 1 mm can be prepared. Manufactured and vegetable fibers may be sectioned anywhere along their length (54-59). Animal hairs may be sectioned to yield additional identifying characteristics (60-61). When observing manufactured fiber cross sections, the general shape and distribution of delustrant, pigment particles, or both; the presence and size of spherulites or voids; depth of dye penetration; and surface treatments should be recorded when present. The fiber dimensions measured from a cross section can be used for the calculation of birefringence and the determination of the modification ratio of multilobed fibers.

7.7.2. Solubility Testing. Solubility is a destructive method. Solubility testing can, however, provide supplemental information to nondestructive methods. Possible reactions of fibers to solvents include partial and complete solubility, swelling, shrinking, gelling, and color change. If solubility tests are used as part of an identification scheme, appropriate controls should be run following the laboratory’s quality assurance and control guidelines for a lot or batch of reagents or solvents. It is desirable to view known and questioned fibers simultaneously when comparing their solubilities (5, 62-64).

7.7.3. Heat Effects. A polarized light microscope equipped with a hot stage is recommended for observations of the effect of heat on thermoplastic fibers. Using slightly uncrossed polars, one may observe droplet formation, contraction, softening, charring, and melting of fibers over a range of temperatures. These observations, including melting temperature or temperatures, should be recorded. Because manufactured fibers are composed of mixtures of chemical compounds rather than pure polymers and are a combination of crystalline and amorphous regions, changes are observed over a temperature range rather than at a single melting point (5, 7, 65-69). Fibers should be mounted in an inert, heat-resistant medium, such as a high-temperature-stable silicone oil, to ensure reproducible melting behavior (70-71). Accurate and reproducible results are best obtained using a heating rate of no greater than 1-2°C/minute when near the initial melting temperature. The hot stage should be calibrated using appropriate standards, following established guidelines. The recommended melting point apparatus should be adjustable for temperatures from ambient to at least 300°C, in increments of 0.1°C, and should allow a heating rate of as low as 1°C/minute (72-79).

7.7.4. Fiber Surface Morphology. Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) is used as an imaging and microanalytical tool in the characterization of fibers. Fiber surface morphology can be examined with great depth of field at continually variable magnifications. Fibers, prepared cross sections, or both are mounted to a specimen stub and may be conductively coated to prevent possible electron beam charging. The use of a suitable calibration standard is recommended for the accurate measurement of fiber cross sections.

Applications of SEM-EDS to fiber analysis include the characterization of fiber cross sections, identification of pigments and delustrants by elemental analysis, fiber damage due to cuts and tears (51-53, 80-82), trace debris on fibers, surface feature modifications such as washer/dryer abrasion (83), and acid-washed treatment of denim garments (84). Authors have examined fiber bonding in nonwoven fabrics and shrink-proofing treatment of wool (85). Surface imaging using the SEM-EDS as an aid in the identification of animal hair-scale structure has been reported (86).

8.0. Report Documentation

The examiner’s analytical notes should reflect the particular characteristics used in the microscopic comparison, especially any calculated values, descriptions, diagrams, or photographs. A positive association is when the questioned and known fibers exhibit the same microscopic characteristics and optical properties in all tested parameters and are therefore consistent with originating from the same source. A negative association is when the questioned and known fibers are different in some significant aspect and are therefore from separate sources. An inconclusive result indicates that no conclusion could be reached, and some explanation is required as to why a definitive conclusion was not possible.

9.0. References

(1) Grieve, M. C. and Garger, E. F. An improved method for rapid and accurate scanning of fibers on tape, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1981) 26:560-563.

(2) Choudhry, M. Y. A novel technique for the collection and recovery of foreign fibers in forensic science case work, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1988) 33:249-253.

(3) Wickenheiser, R. A. Fiber concentration by membrane vacuum filtration in preparation for rapid microscopic comparison, Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal (1992) 25(31):177-181.

(4) Chable, J., Roux, C., and Lennard, C. Collection of fiber evidence using water-soluble cellophane tape, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1994) 39(6):1520-1527.

(5) Gaudette, B. The forensic aspects of textile fiber examination. In: Forensic Science Handbook (Vol. 2). Ed., R. Saferstein. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.

(6) Robertson, J. The forensic examination of fibers: Protocols and approaches—An overview. In: Forensic Examination of Fibers. Ed., J. Robertson. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1992.

(7) Carroll, G. R. Forensic fibre microscopy. In: Forensic Examination of Fibers. Ed., J. Robertson. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1992.

(8) Corbman, B. P. Textiles: Fiber To Fabric. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983, pp. 68-142.

(9) Grayson, M., ed. Encyclopedia of Textiles, Fibers, and Nonwoven Fabrics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984.

(10) Cook, R. and Norton, D. An evaluation of mounting media for use in forensic textile fibre examination, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1982) 22:57-63.

(11) Roe, G. M., Cook, R., and North, C. An evaluation of mountants for use in forensic hair examination, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1991) 31:59-65.

(12) McCrone, W. C. Use of aroclors in microscopy, Microscope (1984) 32:277-288.

(13) Sacher, R. New Materials for the microscopist, Microscope (1985) 33:241-246.

(14) Grieve, M. and Deck, S. A new mounting medium for the forensic microscopy of textile fibers, Science and Justice (1995) 35(2) 109-112.

(15) Loveland, R. P. and Centifano, Y. M. Mounting media for microscopy, Microscope (1986) 34:181-242.

(16) Allen, R. M. Practical Refractometry by Means of the Microscope. 2nd ed. R. P. Cargille Laboratories, 1985.

(17) McCrone, W. C., McCrone L. B., and Delly, J. G. Polarized Light Microscopy. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1978.

(18) Metropolitan Police Forensic Science Laboratory. Biology Methods Manual. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, London, 1978, Section 6, pp. 16-17.

(19) David, S. K. and Pailthorpe, M. T. Classification of textile fibers: Production, structure and properties. In: Forensic Examination of Fibers. Ed., J. Robertson. Elllis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1992, pp. 3-10.

(20) Appleyard, H. M. Guide to the Identification of Animal Fibers. 2nd. ed. Wool Industries Research Association, Leeds, United Kingdom, 1978.

(21) Petraco, N. A. Microscopical method to aid in the identification of animal hair, Microscope (1987) 35:83-92.

(22) Robertson, J. The forensic examination of fibers: Protocols and approaches—An overview. In: Forensic Examination of Fibers. Ed., J. Robertson. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1992, pp. 79-87.

(23) Mauersberger, H. R. Matthew’s Textile Fibers. 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1954.

(24) Valaskovic, G. A. Polarized light in multiple birefringent domains: A study of the Herzog Effect, Microscope (1991) 39:269-286.

(25) David, S. K. and Pailthorpe, M. T. Classification of textile fibers: Production, structure and properties. In: Forensic Examination of Fibers. Ed., J. Robertson. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom, 1992, pp. 10-18.

(26) Catling, D. L. and Grayson, J. Identification of Vegetable Fibers. Chapman and Hall, London, 1982.

(27) Luniak, B. Identification of Textile Fibers, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Fibre Blends. 2nd ed. Pitman, London, 1953.

(28) McCrone, W. C. The Asbestos Particle Atlas. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1980.

(29) McCrone, W. C. Asbestos Identification. McCrone Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1987.

(30) Man-Made Vitreous Fiber: Nomenclature, Chemistry, and Physical Properties. Nomenclature Committee of TIMA, Inc., 1993.

(31) Miller, E. T. Practical method for the comparison of mineral wool insulations in forensic laboratories, Journal of the AOAC (1975) 58(5):865-870.

(32) Miller, E. T. Comparison of mineral wool insulations in forensic laboratories, Journal of the AOAC (1977) 60:772-777.

(33) Miller, E. T. Comparison of mineral wool insulations in forensic laboratories: Second collaborative study, Journal of the AOAC (1979) 62(4):792-798.

(34) Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., and Echlin, P. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis: A Text for Biologists, Materials Scientists, and Geologists. Plenum Press, New York, 1992.

(35) McCrone, W. C. Particle characterization by PLM: Part I. No polar, Microscope (1982) 30(3):185-196.

(36) McCrone, W. C. Particle characterization by PLM: Part II. Single polar, Microscope (1982) 30(4):315-331.

(37) McCrone, W. C. Particle characterization by PLM: Part III. Crossed polars, Microscope (1983) 31(2):187-206.

(38) McCrone, W. C. Light microscopy. In: Physical Methods of Chemistry. Vol. 4, eds., B. W. Rossiter and J. F. Hamiton. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1991.

(39) Bloss, F. D. An Introduction to the Methods of Optical Crystallography. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., New York, 1961.

(40) Chamot, E. M. and Mason, C. W. Handbook of Chemical Microscopy. Vol. 1, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1958.

(41) Hartshorne, N. H. and Stuart, A. Crystals and the Polarizing Microscope. 4th ed. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1970.

(42) Stoiber, R. E. and Morse, S. A. Crystal Identification with the Polarizing Microscope. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994.

(43) Feirabend, J. Problems involved in the double refraction determination of stretched polyethylene terephthalate fibers, Melliand Text (English ed., Feb. 1976), pp. 149-156.

(44) Sieminski, M. A. A note on the measurement of birefringence in fibers, Microscope (1975) 23:35-36.

(46) Lloyd, J. B. F. Forensic significance of fluorescent brighteners: Their qualitative TLC characterisation in small quantities of fibre and detergents, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1977) 17:145-152.

(47) Kubic, T. A., King, J. B., and DuBey, I. S. Forensic analysis of colorless textile fibers by fluorescence microscopy, Microscope (1983) 31:213-222.

(48) Hartshorne, A. W. and Laing, D. K. Microspectrofluorimetry of fluorescent dyes and brighteners on single textile fibres, Part 1: Fluorescence emission spectra, Forensic Science International (1991) 51:203-220.

(49) Hartshorne, A. W. and Laing, D. K. Microspectrofluorimetry of fluorescent dyes and brighteners on single textile fibres: Part 2. Colour measurements, Forensic Science International (1991) 51:221-237.

(50) Hartshorne, A. W. and Laing, D. K. Microspectrofluorimetry of fluorescent dyes and brighteners on single textile fibres: Part 3. Fluorescence decay phenomena, Forensic Science International (1991) 51:239-250.

(51) Rochow, Rochow. An Introduction to Microscopy By Means of Light, Electrons, X-Rays, or Ultrasound. Plenum Press, New York, 1978, pp. 211-220.

(52) Heuse, O. and Adolf, F. P. Non-destructive identification of textile fibres by interference microscopy, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1982) 22:103- 122.

(53) Hemsley, D. A., ed. Applied Polymer Light Microscopy. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, 1989.

(54) Hall, D. Practical Fiber Identification. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, 1982.

(55) Palenik, S. and Fitzsimons, C. Fiber cross sections: Part I, Microscope (1990) 38:187-195.

(56) Palenik, S. and Fitzsimons, C. Fiber cross sections: Part II, Microscope (1990) 38:313-320.

(57) Barna, C. E. and Stoeffler, S. F. A new method for cross sectioning single fibers, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1987) 32:761-767.

(58) Grieve, M. C. and Kotowski, T. M. An improved method of preparing fiber cross sections, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1986) 26:29-34.

(59) Craven, B. J. Cross-sectional measurement of cellulose acetate fibers using scanning electron microscopy and image analysis, Microscope (1993) 41:115-117.

(60) Brunner, H. and Coman, B. The Identification of Mammalian Hair. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia, 1974.

(61) Mathiak, H. A. A key to the hairs of mammals of southern Michigan, Journal of Wildlife Management (1993) 2:251-268.

(62) Praeger, S. S. Selective solvents for analyzing textile fiber mixtures, American Dyestuff Report (1957) 46:497-498.

(63) Merkel, R. S. A scheme for fiber identification with emphasis on new polyacrylic, polyamide, polyester and cellulosic fibers, American Dyestuff Report (1960) 49:13-25.

(64) Stratmann, M. The solubility characteristics of fibres, Textile Industries (1970) 72:13-19.

(65) Bruschweiler, W. and Schoch, H. Thermal microscopy of fibres—A methodological addition to fibre analysis, Archiv fuer Kriminologie (1982) 169:89-98.

(66) Grieve, M. C. The use of melting point and refractive index determination to compare colourless polyester fibres, Forensic Science International (1983) 22:31-48.

(67) Hartshorne, A., Wild, F. M., and Babb, N. L. The discrimination of cellulose di- and triacetate fibres by solvent test and melting point determination, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1991) 31:457-461.

(68) Hartshorne, A. W. and Laing, D. K. The identification of polyolefin fibres by infrared spectroscopy and melting point determination, Forensic Science International (1984) 26:45-52.

(69) Smith, S. G. Identification of unknown synthetic fibers: Part III. Revision and application of micro fusion, American Dye Report (1959) 48(26):23-26.

(70) Grabar, D. G. and Haessly, R. Identification of synthetic fibers by micro fusion methods, Analytical Chemistry (1956) 28:1586-1589.

(71) Petraco, N., DeForest, P. R., and Harris, H. A new approach to the microscopical examination and comparison of synthetic fibers encountered in forensic cases, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1980) 25:571-582.

(72) Julian, Y. and McCrone, W. C. Accurate use of hot stages, Microscope (1971) 19:225-234.

(73) Cassidy, F. H. A simple thermistor device for checking the calibration of the Mettler hot stage, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1986) 26:409-415.

(74) Woodard, G. D. Calibration of the Mettler FP2 hot stage, Microscope (1970) 18:105-108.

(75) Skirius, S. A poor microscopist’s hot stage, Microscope (1984) 32:100-102.

(76) Moran, B. R. and Moran, J. F. An inexpensive digital temperature monitoring device for the poor microscopist’s hot stage, Microscope (1987) 35:291-301.

(77) Wilson, L. and McGee, W. W. Construction and calibration of a demountable poor microscopist’s hot stage, Microscope (1988) 36:125-132.

(78) Valaskovic, G. A simple control unit for the EC slide hot stage, Microscope (1991) 39:53-55.

(79) McCrone, W. C. Calibration of the EC slide hot stage, Microscope (1991) 39:43-52.

(80) Pelton, W. R. Distinguishing the cause of textile fiber damage using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), Journal of Forensic Sciences (1995) 40(5):874-882.

(81) Ukpabi, P. and Pelton, W. R. Using the scanning electron microscope to identify the cause of fibre damage, Part I: A review of related literature, Journal of the Canadian Society of Forensic Science (1995) 28(3):181-187.

(82) Pelton, W. R. and Ukpabi, P. Using the scanning electron microscope to identify the cause of fibre damage, Part II: An exploratory study, Journal of the Canadian Society of Forensic Science (1995) 28(3):189-200.

(83) Goynes, W. R. A scanning electron microscope study of washer-dryer abrasion in textile fibers. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual EMSA Meeting, 1971, pp. 346- 347.

(84) Hecking, L. T. and Erikson, C. Characterization of acid washed denim garments and accessories using the stereomicroscope and the scanning electron microscope, Customs Laboratory Bulletin (1993) 5(3).

(85) Greaves, P. H. and Saville, B. P. Scanning electron microscopy. In: Microscopy of Textile Fibres. Bios Scientific Publishers LTD, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1995, pp. 51-67.

(86) Robson, D. Fibre surface imaging, Journal of the Forensic Science Society (1994) 34(3):187-191.

(87) Wiggins, K. Microfibers: A forensic perspective, Journal of Forensic Sciences (1997) 42:842-845.

Back to chapter listing.