|
|
|
October 1999 Volume 1 Number
3
2nd
International Symposium on the
Forensic Examination of Questioned Documents
Abstracts of Presentations
and Poster Sessions
Albany, New York
June 14 – 18, 1999
To locate an abstract
by author, check the alphabetical
list of authors.
To locate an abstract
by title, check the alphabetical list
of abstract titles.
The abstracts of the presentations
and poster sessions may be viewed consecutively in alphabetical
order by authors' last names by linking to one of the following:
Poster Sessions
Part
1 (Cavanaugh, Torres, and Grose - Mercer)
Part 2 (Mohammed
- Streeter and Zercie)
Part 3 (Taylor and
Mokrzycki - Winchester)
Presentations (Parts
1-6):
Part
1 (Anthony - Doherty)
Part 2 (Giannelli, Weatherhead, and
Weatherhead)
Part 3 (continuation of Giannelli,
Weatherhead, and Weatherhead)
Part 4 (Hicks - Moenssens)
Part 5 (Morton - Orenstein)
Part 6 (Panhorst - Saks)
Part 7 (Sang - Tolliver)
Back
to the top
Author
List
Anthony, A. T., Georgia Bureau of Investigation,
Decatur, Georgia:
Source of Significant Typeface Defects on Electronic Typewriter
Printwheels
Cavanaugh, M. H., Torres, B. L.,
and Grose, W. P., Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles, California:
ESDA Cascade Developer Awareness
Dawson, M. H., South Carolina Department of Social
Services, Columbia, South Carolina:
More Exemplars, Please, and Check the Medical Records
Doherty, P. E., Colorado Bureau of Investigation
Crime Laboratory, Denver, Colorado:
Free Ride to Super Bowl XXXII
Drexler, S. G., Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences, Birmingham,
Alabama:
Computer-Assisted Method for the Generation of Courtroom Charts
for Presentations of Handwriting Evidence
Giannelli, P. C., Weatherhead, A.
J., and Weatherhead, R. W., Case
Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio:
Post-Daubert Considerations in Document Examinations
Hayes, J. L., James L. Hayes & Associates,
Park Ridge, Illinois:
Method for Identifying a Signature Written With the Intent to
Deny Authorship
Hicks, A. F., Mississippi Crime Laboratory, Jackson,
Mississippi:
American Board of Forensic Document Examiners
Howes, D. R., New York State Police Forensic Investigation
Center, Albany, New York:
Gambling With the Law
Jamieson, J. A., Virginia Division of Forensic Science,
Richmond, Virginia:
Introduction to Energy-Curable Printing Inks
Kam, M., Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:
Proficiency Testing for Forensic Document Examiners
Mercer, C., Clarke Mercer Forensic Laboratory, Greenfield,
Indiana:
Eradication of Impression Evidence: Part 2
Mettyear, N., and Windsor, C., PenOp Limited, Frome, United Kingdom:
Numerical Methods and Tools for Signature Analysis
Miller, L. A., Forensic Document Laboratory, Miami,
Florida:
Examination of a Manuscript of Historical Interest
Moenssens, A. A., University of Missouri, Kansas City,
Missouri:
Meeting the Daubert Challenge to Handwriting Evidence:
Preparing for a Daubert Hearing
Mohammed, L. A., San Diego Sheriff's Crime Laboratory,
San Diego, California:
Evaluation of Documents Produced by a High-Speed, High-Volume,
Commercial Scanning Process
Moran, T. L., United States Secret Service, Washington,
DC:
Four Writing Instruments, Two Writing Surfaces, and One Writer
Morton, S. E., San Francisco Police Department,
San Francisco, California:
The Forensic Science Foundation and Its Proficiency Testing Program:
Panel Discussion
Oleksow, D. L., Forensic Science Laboratories, San
Diego, California:
Protocol for Business Records Examinations
Orenstein, J., Department of Justice, Washington,
DC:
Effect of the Daubert Decision on Document Examinations
From the Prosecutor's Perspective
Panhorst, F. H., Indiana State Police Laboratory,
Indianapolis, Indiana:
Case Study: An Individual With Two Styles of Handprinting
Picciochi, R. T., New York City Police Department,
Jamaica, New York;
and Fiertner, J., Nassau County Police Department,
Mineola, New York:
Recovery of Evidential Images From Color Polaroid Land Negative
Sheets
Plautz, D. M., American Society of Crime Laboratory
Directors, Garner, North Carolina:
ASCLD/LAB Accreditation Process: Are You Up to the Challenge?
Reed, D. D., Arkansas State Crime Laboratory,
Little Rock, Arkansas:
Infrared Luminescence, Transmitted Light, and a PS 89 Wide-Field
MagnifierCAn Alternate Method of Deciphering
the Undecipherable: A Case Report
Reid, M. A., Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Washington, DC:
Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title Examinations and Comparisons
Richards, G. B., Richards Forensic Services, Laurel,
Maryland:
JFK–Marilyn Monroe Papers: The Dark Side of Historic Documents
Rile, H. C., Long Beach, California:
American Board of Forensic Document Examiners
Runyon, K. S., Minneapolis Police Department, Minneapolis,
Minnesota;
and Davis, D. W., Expert Digital Solutions, Incorporated,
Edina, Minnesota:
Courtroom Computer Graphics, Animation, and Interactive Multimedia
Ryan, D. J., Nassau County Police Department,
Merrick, New York:
Scientific Working Group for Questioned Document Examination
(SWGDOC)
Saks, M. J., University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa:
Planning the Trip From Folk Art to Science: Why and How
Sang, J. L., Sang Forensic Document Laboratory,
Glen Head, New York:
Demonstrating Natural Variation—Write-On Software: A New
Tool
Shiver, F. S.,
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation
Laboratory, Forest Park, Georgia:
Daubert Hearings: Case Scenario
Shiver, F. S., U.S. Army Criminal Investigation
Laboratory, Forest Park, Georgia:
SWGDOC Subcommittee
for Standard and Operating Procedures Terminology
Storer, K. M., United States Secret Service, Washington,
DC:
Examples of Individual Characteristics
Streeter, J. L., and Zercie, K. B.,
Connecticut State
Police, Meriden, Connecticut:
Examination of Accessories and Components of a Word Processor
Results in Developing Inculpatory Evidence and Investigative
Leads: A Case Study
Taylor, J. H., and Mokrzycki, G.
M., Federal Bureau
of Investigation, Washington, DC:
Advances in Document Examination: The Video Spectral Comparator
2000
Throckmorton, G. J., Salt Lake City Police Department,
Salt Lake City, Utah:
Genuine Signature: Fraudulent Document
Tolliver, D. K., Indiana State Police Laboratory,
Indianapolis, Indiana:
Individual and Interesting Letter Formations
Welch, T. W., Michigan State Police, East Lansing,
Michigan:
Eradication Of Impression
Evidence: Part 1
Winchester, J. M., Florida Department of Law Enforcement,
Tallahassee, Florida:
Preparing Research Articles for Publication in Forensic Science
Journals
Back
to the top
Title
List
Advances in Document Examination:
The Video Spectral Comparator 2000 by Taylor, J. H., and Mokrzycki,
G. M., Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC
American Board of Forensic Document
Examiners by Hicks, A. F., Mississippi Crime Laboratory,
Jackson, Mississippi
American Board of Forensic Document
Examiners by Rile, H. C., Long Beach, California
ASCLD/LAB Accreditation Process:
Are You Up to the Challenge? by Plautz, D. M., American
Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, Garner, North Carolina
Case Study: An Individual With Two
Styles of Handprinting by Panhorst, F. H., Indiana
State Police Laboratory, Indianapolis, Indiana
Computer-Assisted Method for the Generation
of Courtroom Charts for Presentations of Handwriting Evidence
by Drexler, S. G., Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences,
Birmingham, Alabama
Courtroom Computer Graphics, Animation,
and Interactive Multimedia by Runyon, K. S., Minneapolis
Police Department, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
and Davis, D. W., Expert Digital Solutions, Incorporated,
Edina, Minnesota
Daubert Hearings: Case Scenario by Shiver, F. S.,
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory, Forest Park,
Georgia
Demonstrating Natural Variation—Write-On
Software: A New Tool by Sang, J. L., Sang Forensic
Document Laboratory, Glen Head, New York
Effect of the Daubert Decision
on Document Examinations From the Prosecutor's Perspective by
Orenstein, J., Department of Justice, Washington, DC
Eradication Of Impression Evidence:
Part 1 by Welch, T. W., Michigan State Police, East
Lansing, Michigan
Eradication of Impression Evidence:
Part 2 by Mercer, C., Clarke Mercer Forensic Laboratory,
Greenfield, Indiana
ESDA Cascade Developer Awareness
by Cavanaugh, M. H., Torres, B. L., and Grose, W. P., Los
Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles, California
Evaluation of Documents Produced
by a High-Speed, High-Volume, Commercial Scanning Process by
Mohammed, L. A., San Diego Sheriff's Crime Laboratory,
San Diego, California
Examination of Accessories and Components
of a Word Processor Results in Developing Inculpatory Evidence
and Investigative Leads: A Case Study by Streeter, J. L.,
and Zercie, K. B., Connecticut State Police, Meriden,
Connecticut
Examination of a Manuscript of Historical
Interest by Miller, L. A., Forensic Document Laboratory,
Miami, Florida
Examples of Individual Characteristics
by Storer, K. M., United States Secret Service, Washington,
DC
The Forensic Science Foundation and
Its Proficiency Testing Program: Panel Discussion by Morton,
S. E., San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco,
California
Four Writing Instruments, Two Writing
Surfaces, and One Writer by Moran, T. L., United States
Secret Service, Washington, DC
Free Ride to Super Bowl XXXII by
Doherty, P. E., Colorado Bureau of Investigation Crime
Laboratory, Denver, Colorado
Gambling With the Law by Howes, D. R., New
York State Police Forensic Investigation Center, Albany, New
York
Genuine Signature: Fraudulent Document
by Throckmorton, G. J., Salt Lake City Police Department,
Salt Lake City, Utah
Individual and Interesting Letter
Formations by Tolliver, D. K., Indiana State Police
Laboratory, Indianapolis, Indiana
Infrared Luminescence, Transmitted
Light, and a PS 89 Wide-Field MagnifierCAn
Alternate Method of Deciphering the Undecipherable: A Case Report
by Reed, D. D., Arkansas State Crime Laboratory, Little
Rock, Arkansas
Introduction to Energy-Curable Printing
Inks by Jamieson, J. A., Virginia Division of Forensic
Science, Richmond, Virginia
JFK–Marilyn Monroe Papers: The Dark Side
of Historic Documents by Richards, G. B., Richards
Forensic Services, Laurel, Maryland
Meeting the Daubert Challenge
to Handwriting Evidence: Preparing for a Daubert Hearing
by Moenssens, A. A., University of Missouri, Kansas
City, Missouri
Method for Identifying a Signature
Written With the Intent to Deny Authorship by Hayes, J. L.,
James L. Hayes & Associates, Park Ridge, Illinois
More Exemplars, Please, and Check
the Medical Records by Dawson, M. H., South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Columbia, South Carolina
Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title
Examinations and Comparisons by Reid, M. A., Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC
Numerical Methods and Tools for Signature
Analysis by Mettyear, N., and Windsor, C., PenOp Limited,
Frome, United Kingdom
Planning the Trip From Folk Art to
Science: Why and How by Saks, M. J., University of
Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Post-Daubert Considerations
in Document Examinations by Giannelli, P. C., Weatherhead,
A. J., and Weatherhead, R. W., Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, Ohio
Preparing Research Articles for Publication
in Forensic Science Journals by Winchester, J. M., Florida
Department of Law Enforcement, Tallahassee, Florida
Proficiency Testing for Forensic
Document Examiners by Kam, M., Drexel University, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
Protocol for Business Records Examinations
by Oleksow, D. L., Forensic Science Laboratories, San
Diego, California
Recovery of Evidential Images From
Color Polaroid Land Negative Sheets by Picciochi, R. T., New
York City Police Department, Jamaica, New York; and Fiertner,
J., Nassau County Police Department, Mineola, New York
Scientific Working Group for Questioned
Document Examination (SWGDOC) by Ryan, D. J., Nassau
County Police Department, Merrick, New York
Source of Significant Typeface Defects
on Electronic Typewriter Printwheels by Anthony, A. T., Georgia
Bureau of Investigation, Decatur, Georgia
SWGDOC Subcommittee for Standard
and Operating Procedures Terminology by Shiver, F. S., U.S.
Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory, Forest Park, Georgia
Back
to the top
FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS OCTOBER 1999 VOLUME
1 NUMBER 3 |
