Home About Us Laboratory Services Forensic Science Communications Back Issues October 2006 standards Standards and Guidelines - Forensic Science...

Standards and Guidelines - Forensic Science Communications - October 2006

Standards and Guidelines - Forensic Science Communications - October 2006

fsc_logo_top.jpg
fsc_logo_left.jpg

October 2006 - Volume 8 - Number 4

Standards and Guidelines

Scientific Working Group on Dogs and Orthogonal Detection Guidelines: General Guidelines for Training, Certification, Maintenance, and Documentation

Scientific Working Group on Dogs and Orthogonal Detection Guidelines (SWGDOG)

Objective | Introduction | Statement of Purpose | Initial Training | Canine/Handler Team Certification | Maintenance Training | Proficiency Assessment | Documentation

Objective

This document provides guidelines for canine team certification, postcertification maintenance training, and documentation required of operational canine programs. These guidelines have been designed to create the foundation on which more targeted guidelines will be developed.

Introduction

The Scientific Working Group on Dogs and Orthogonal Detection Guidelines (SWGDOG) was formally established in January 2005 in an effort to develop consensus-based guidelines that can be shared across all groups involved in detector-dog work. SWGDOG is currently cosponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the FBI and is managed through Florida International University. Membership in SWGDOG includes representatives from 6 international, 10 federal, 15 state and local, and 8 private detection-dog organizations. Additional information on SWGDOG is available at http://www.swgdog.org/.

Statement of Purpose

To provide recommended general guidelines for training, certification, and documentation pertaining to all canine disciplines. (Discipline-specific guidelines are found within the corresponding subcommittee documents.)

Initial Training
1. The canine shall be trained by a competent individual or entity through a structured curriculum with specific training and learning objectives.
2. The handler shall be trained by a competent individual or entity through a structured curriculum with specific training and learning objectives.
3. The canine/handler team’s training shall be continued to achieve a level of operational proficiency until certification evaluation.
4. The training shall be structured to meet the typical mission requirements of the canine/handler team’s department/organization.
Canine/Handler Team Certification
1. Certification for the named canine/handler team shall be valid for one year.
1.1. Certification does not relieve the canine/handler team from obtaining regular maintenance training and following other recommended SWGDOG guidelines.
2. The certifying officials shall not be routinely involved in the day-to-day training of the canine/handler team being tested.
3. The canine/handler team shall achieve at least 90 percent proficiency for successful certification, unless otherwise dictated by the specific discipline.
4. A mission-oriented test environment shall be used.
5. Certification shall consist of a number of assessments that together form the full test.
5.1. Each assessment is the evaluation of a search.
5.2. Aids/targets to be used in the certification process shall not have been used in the day-to-day training activities of the team being certified.
6. The certification shall include at least two of the following types of assessments:
6.1. Odor-Recognition Assessment
6.1.1. The handler shall be advised of the parameters of the search.
6.1.2. The handler shall know the number of target objects but not placement.
6.1.3. The evaluating official shall know the desired outcome of the search.
6.2. Comprehensive Assessment
6.2.1. The handler shall be advised of the parameters of the search yet shall not know the desired outcome.
6.2.2. The handler shall not know the number or placement of the target objects.
6.2.3. The evaluating official shall know the desired outcome of the search.
6.2.4. The assessments shall include a negative search.
6.3. Double-Blind Assessment
6.3.1. No participant or observer present at the assessment location(s) shall be aware of the parameters of the search.
6.3.2. The assessments shall include a negative search.
7. Each assessment shall address the following areas:
7.1. Systematic Search Pattern
7.2. The handler shall demonstrate control of the canine and the ability to complete a systematic search.
7.3. Animal Response Interpretation
7.3.1. The handler shall accurately interpret the canine’s change in behavior.
7.3.2. The handler shall indicate when the canine has made a final response.
7.4. Final Response Interpretation
7.4.1. The canine/handler team shall locate the source of the target odor or interpret the absence of the target odor.
8. A canine/handler team that fails to complete the certification process shall complete a corrective-action plan before making another attempt to obtain certification.
9. Any competent individual or entity may enhance the recommended SWGDOG guidelines in order to make the requirements more stringent.
Maintenance Training
1. The canine/handler team shall conduct regular, objective-oriented training sufficient to maintain operational proficiency.
1.1. Training is meant to improve and enhance the performance of the handler, the canine, and the canine/handler team. Because learning is a process of trial and error, training situations should involve scenarios where mistakes are sought.
Proficiency Assessment
1. The canine/handler team shall perform periodic proficiency assessments as outlined in Section 6 of the Canine Handler Team Certification, including odor-recognition assessment, comprehensive assessment, and double-blind assessment.
Documentation
1. The handler, department, and/or the organization shall maintain training, proficiency assessment, seizure, and/or deployment/utilization records.
1.1. Records shall contain discipline-related specifics.
1.2. Records shall be standardized within the department/organization.
1.3. Deployment, utilization, and seizure information shall be separated from training and testing information.
1.4. Supervisory review is recommended.
1.5. Digital format is recommended to facilitate compiling and analyzing data.
2. Reliability of the canine/handler team shall be based upon the results of certification and proficiency assessments.
2.1. Training records do not necessarily reflect reliability.
2.2. Training records are necessary to illustrate the type and amount of training that the team has received before and after certification.
2.3. Confirmed operational outcomes can be used to determine capability.
2.4. Unconfirmed operational outcomes shall not be used to determine capability because they do not correctly evaluate a canine/handler team’s performance (e.g., residual odor can be present, or concealment may preclude discovery).
3. Training-Aid Records
3.1. Training aids shall be clearly labeled in a manner to support accountability.
3.2. Appropriate records shall be maintained by the handler, department, and/or the organization.
4. Each animal shall undergo an annual veterinary examination.
4.1. Medical records shall be maintained in a manner such that they are accessible to the handler, department, and/or the organization.